
The Brief:
Australian law firms just had their best year in a decade. But not every firm won the same way.
Large firms chased demand growth, the Big 8 chased rates, and only one path led to a bigger payday.
Australia’s legal market had a ripper year.
Demand rose 5.4%.
Fees worked jumped 10.2%, the second fastest pace in over a decade.
Profit per equity partner has climbed 74.2% since 2020, well ahead of the 51.2% growth in the broader economy.
Sounds like one big win. It’s not.
A new report from the Thomson Reuters Institute and the University of Melbourne splits the market into three tiers: the Big 8, Large firms and a newly created Midsize bucket. And once you break it down, the gap between the top and everyone else is only getting wider.
Take profit per equity partner:
The Big 8, led by top firms Mallesons, Allens and Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer, grew 19.7%.
Large firms managed just 7.2%.
Midsize firms edged past them at 7.7%, on the back of a strong turnaround.
Profit per lawyer tells the same story:
Big 8 up 15.2%.
Large firms up 4.4%.
Midsize firms grew just 2.8%.

But demand growth tells a completely different story:
Large firms grew demand 9.7%, more than four times any other segment.
The Big 8 grew demand just 2.2%.
Midsize firms sat close behind at 2.4%.

So how did the Big 8 turn the weakest demand growth into the strongest profit growth?
Not by working harder. Utilisation across the whole market rose just 1.3%, meaning lawyers weren’t putting in dramatically more hours anywhere.
The Big 8’s edge came down to two levers: rates and reputation. They pushed worked rates up 6.2%, well ahead of the rest of the market, and leaned on entrenched client relationships to make it stick. That’s how modest demand growth turned into a 19.7% jump in profit per equity partner — charging more for the same work, and getting away with it.
It’s not a new trick either. Thomson Reuters’ Feb 2026 Report showed that Big 8 leaned on rate rises and cost discipline to stay ahead.
Large firms played a completely different game. Rather than raising rates, they chased scale, which is exactly why demand jumped 9.7%. To keep up, they hired hard, lifting headcount 7.9%, and the expense bill followed, up 11.6%, well above the rest of the market.
Midsize firms had the best comeback arc of the three. A year ago they were quietly going backwards. This year, demand flipped from contraction to 2.4% growth and profit per lawyer rose 2.8%. Most notably, while cutting nearly every other cost line, midsize firms lifted tech and knowledge management spend per lawyer by 16.0% — the most aggressive per-lawyer tech bet of any segment.